Skip to Main Content UMKC University Libraries

Litigation Drafting Resources

Steps to research major documents in litigation

Trial Briefs Research Steps

Bloomberg/BNA > Litigation & Dockets tab > Dockets > Search Dockets > Browse to U.S. District Court Dockets – Districts of Missouri > key words “trial brief” and “subject matter” e.g. “age discrimination” > Scroll to bottom and “Search” > Click on link to Docket > scroll to highlighted search term “Trial Brief” > click on green number to the left [NOTE: this is only federal court dockets]  

WestlawNext  > Am Jur Trials > search : title(“the trial brief”)

Sample Trial Brief Table of Contents

Circuit Court of Missouri,

Kansas City.

Jackson County

Edith MORGAN, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

No. 00 CV 224362.
June 15, 2004.
Division 11

General Motors Corporation's Trial Brief

John T. Hickey, Jr., P.C., Brian D. Sieve, P.C., Renee D. Honigberg, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 200 East Randolph Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60601, Telephone: (312) 861-2000, Facsimile: (312) 861-2200, -and- John W. Cowden MO #21447, Elizabeth Raines MO #53192, Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice, L.L.C., 2400 Pershing Road, Suite 500, Kansas City, Missouri 64108-2504, Telephone: (816) 471-2121, Facsimile: (816) 472-0288, Counsel for Defendant, General Motors Corporation.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FACTUAL OVERVIEW
1
I. The Accident
1
II. The 1999 Chevrolet Suburban
2
III. The Lawsuit
3
LEGAL STANDARDS AND ANALYSIS
4
I. Plaintiffs Cannot Prevail On Their Strict Liability Or Negligence Claims
5
A. Plaintiffs' Claim s
5
1. Strict Liability -- Design Defect
5
2. Negligence -- Failure To Use Ordinary Care
6
B. Plaintiffs Cannot Establish Essential Elements Of Their Strict Liability And Negligence Claims
6
1. The Suburban's Roof Was Not Unreasonably Dangerous
7
2. The Allegedly Defective Roof Did Not Cause Mr. Thomas's Injuries Or Death
7
II. Compensatory and Punitive Damages Issues
8
A. Compensatory Damages
8
1. Pecuniary losses suffered by reason of the death;
8
2. Funeral expenses;
8
3. Reasonable value of services, consortium, companionship, comfort, instruction, guidance, counsel, training, and support; and
8
4. Damages the deceased may have suffered between the time of injury and the time of death
8
B. Plaintiffs Cannot Present Clear And Convincing Evidence To Support Their Aggravating Circumstances Damages Claims
9
1. To Succeed On Their Aggravating Circumstances Damages Claims, Plaintiffs Must Establish By Clear and Convincing Evidence That GM's Conduct Was “Tantamount To Intentional Wrongdoing.”
9
2. Courts Applying Missouri Law Have Repeatedly Found That No Punitive Damages Claims Exists Where -- As Here -- Defendants Have Complied With Applicable Safety Regulations Or Industry Standards
10
CONCLUSION
13

Plaintiffs' wrongful death products liability action seeks compensatory and aggravating circumstances damages based on the alleged defective design of the roof of a 1999 Chevrolet Suburban. In this trial brief, Defendant General Motors Corporation (“GM”) summaries the evidence that will be introduced at trial and explains the legal and factual significance of that evidence.